I'm going to post this for the class now, because I’ve been getting crap about it from all sides for over a year now.
I love the stories. The story is what keeps me reading the books. And unless we're talking porn, the story is what keeps a movie going. I don't need a whole lot of *flash* *flash* *bang* *bang* to be interested. So when the story of a book is entirely desecrated for the action and flashy elements, it bugs me.
I'm sick of people talking down to me or acting as if I'm some unintelligent twit who deserves snide comments just because I believe that if you're adapting a book to a movie you need to be faithful to the story. I'm quite aware that you cannot word for word transcribe a 200+ page book to screen. It's not possible. However there are ways to adequately translate a book so that the movie is a truthful representation or at the very least, very close (i.e. - the first two movies). I was able to enjoy SS and CoS and relax on the things that were missing or the things that really wouldn't have taken much more time and energy to do right in the first place with those two because the stories were pretty much the same. All of a sudden in PoA Kloves and Cucukaroo decided that the story wasn't compelling enough as is? Or somehow didn't move the story forward properly? What they did, to my favorite book no less, was inexcusable. What I truly find amazing is that I've read PoA many, many times and I read my favorite scenes aloud a lot, add to that the fact that I have the book on my iPod. And, for instance, the Shrieking Shack scene reads -- at a moderate pace -- about the same amount of time as the scene in the movie. I know for a fact I'm not the only one who knows this.
I've seen movies recently where they took a small part of the plot and made that the focal point of the movie and then pulled some other plot situations out of their ass when the original plot was A LOT more compelling (i.e. - The Bourne Identity). I really don't like it in
any situation. And when it is something like HP where so many people have fallen in love with the story, you should feel an obligation to be faithful to it. Not to make a movie name for your self above all else. God and it takes like 2 minutes to read each of the damn books, so I really have no tolerance for "well, no I haven't read the books." Don't be so damn lazy. Shit. And you especially have no right to get on my case for my feelings on the matter.
For the record I also loathe when movies, shows, etc. are "based on a true story" but there is barely any truth as to what actually happened in the movie. It drives me crazy. So much so that I wrote an A paper on it for a communications ethics class in college.
Finally, SO many people agreed with what I said about PoA and were saying the same things themselves that I don't think it was out of the realm of feasibility to expect that there would be other people just as anti-GoF as I am. I really wasn't expecting so many of the faithful readers to accept GoF with open arms. My bad.
I did go see Walk the Line yesterday. I thought it was very good. The acting was superb and I was really impressed with Reese Witherspoon's voice. Joaquin's as well, definitely, but I was sort of blown away by her talent because she made such a big deal about how much she was scared to take the role. I thought it was going to be another Renee Zellwegger thing.
Wednesday is a half-day at work! That means RENT in the middle of the day! SQUEE!!!!!
Not so squee is the fact that I gave up my bi-weekly day off on Dec. 9th for an external assignment at work and that's the day Brokeback Mountain comes out!!!!! I'm so upset! I would have been like the first person in the theater that morning! I'm going to have to get up all early on Saturday to go see it. I can't wait; I've been waiting for BBM for so damn long that I'm actually more excited about it coming out than I am RENT!
Anxious SQUEE them both!!!!